683588266a17025b6251fbae Ligeia, you are legally entitled to your opinion, but you are factually incorrect about how the art world functions.
1. "Art does not cost money."
This is a dangerous myth.
Go into an art supply store and try to walk out with canvases, high-quality paints, brushes, and varnish for free. Tell the cashier "I do this for love." They will call the police.
Art requires Capital (materials) and Time (labor).
When you say "art is free," you are devaluing the labor of every artist on this platform. You are confusing a Hobby (which costs you money) with a Profession (which makes you money).
2. The Banksy Argument (You are proving my point):
You keep bringing up Banksy to prove that "nothing lasts" and "names don't matter."
Here is the reality check:
Banksy established an organization called "Pest Control" specifically to authenticate his works.
Why? Because without that proof of origin, his art would be worthless fakes.
He literally created a centralized version of what I am proposing with Blockchain. He protects his "nickname" fiercely because that nickname is a Brand worth over $50 Million.
3. "Government Name" vs. Brand:
In the economy, nobody cares about your government name; they care about your Reputation (Brand).
Coca-Cola is a "nickname." Nike is a "nickname." Banksy is a "nickname."
They are all Assets worth billions because they are trusted and verified.
You are arguing that artists should be content with memories and anonymity.
I am arguing that artists deserve the same tools Banksy uses: Authentication, Value, and Protection.
If you want to create art for free and have it wash away, that is your choice.
But stop telling professional artists that they shouldn't want to get paid or protected just because you prefer a hobbyist mindset.
1. "Art does not cost money."
This is a dangerous myth.
Go into an art supply store and try to walk out with canvases, high-quality paints, brushes, and varnish for free. Tell the cashier "I do this for love." They will call the police.
Art requires Capital (materials) and Time (labor).
When you say "art is free," you are devaluing the labor of every artist on this platform. You are confusing a Hobby (which costs you money) with a Profession (which makes you money).
2. The Banksy Argument (You are proving my point):
You keep bringing up Banksy to prove that "nothing lasts" and "names don't matter."
Here is the reality check:
Banksy established an organization called "Pest Control" specifically to authenticate his works.
Why? Because without that proof of origin, his art would be worthless fakes.
He literally created a centralized version of what I am proposing with Blockchain. He protects his "nickname" fiercely because that nickname is a Brand worth over $50 Million.
3. "Government Name" vs. Brand:
In the economy, nobody cares about your government name; they care about your Reputation (Brand).
Coca-Cola is a "nickname." Nike is a "nickname." Banksy is a "nickname."
They are all Assets worth billions because they are trusted and verified.
You are arguing that artists should be content with memories and anonymity.
I am arguing that artists deserve the same tools Banksy uses: Authentication, Value, and Protection.
If you want to create art for free and have it wash away, that is your choice.
But stop telling professional artists that they shouldn't want to get paid or protected just because you prefer a hobbyist mindset.
, so i really think it is a problem that is on the players side (mainly) I agree there are some issues but they are trying to fix it and so far it is ok for me... and yes of course we all spend real money on it ... without it won't work I am aware of that - but what you want is just not something that I want, as an artist on the game you were talking about things I just can't imagine and I don't want, I don't want my art beeing sold for real money or did I get that wrong? And for the copyright... nah, most of the players use references they might have a copyright on it too so? It is an idea that just doesn't work...
Comment